Posted by
Dustyo on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:25:06 PM
I have to say that Ferraro did not bow out gracefully for talking out of place, like Obama's surrogate did. In apologizing she hit off another slap at Obama. That was bad manners at the very least wouldn't you say? Rumor has it that she has made other slanted statements where blacks are concerned. All I want to know is, why not get on with the issues and show how your candidate is better than the other one? Why stoop to these stupid hysterical games and then like passing notes in school, writing a letter to Hillary? I wonder what Ferraro thought she was doing by making those remarks? What was in her mind? Did she have a plan of some kind? Nothing like having an object lesson to prove Obama's saying we need a change in Washington. I am so tired of tit for tat and bickering like little spoiled children in every office and setting of government.
It seems to me that the politics of attacking your opponents with half-statements or innuendos are not going to work anymore. Anyway, I hope that is true. People have too many sources at their fingertipsto get the correct information for themselves. We need to call these immature ones into account,so we can get on with getting along and building a healthy, strong nation; instead of tearing it down word by silly, mean word.
What a refreshing thought. People reduced to discussing the issues until they come to a fair and agreeable understanding and then working together to implement them. Which of the presidential wanna-be's do you think has the most skills right now to do that? What do I mean? Well, which one seems the most like a level headed adult with consistency and is not easily pushed into extremes but stops and thinks about things first? And then asks, "What is best for our country'?"